CPA with Radio Nepal

https://radionepalonline.com/program?program=%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%AE%20%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A6 

CPA 18th Anniversary

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BQAbSNKhW/ 

कसरी सम्भव भयो टीआरसी विधेयक ?

संसद्ले पारित गरेको संक्रमणकालीन न्याय सम्बन्धी कानुनमा हत्या, यातना, बेपत्ता र जबर्जस्तीकरणी जस्ता मुद्दामा मेलमिलाप हुन नसक्ने, यी बाहेकका मामलामा पीडितको सहमतिमा अनिवार्य हुने, बलात्कार जस्ता विषयमा हदम्याद पर्याप्त भएन र आयोगले मुद्दा चलाउने विषयमा सरकारमा हैन, सिधै महान्यायाधिवक्ताकोमा सिफारिस गर्नुपर्ने जस्ता मुख्य चार मामलामा जब सर्वोच्च अदालतले आदेश जारी गर्‍यो, त्यसपछि कानुन संशोधनको मामला आरम्भ भएको हो ।

आरम्भमा यो आदेशको पुनरावलोकन त्यसपछि संशोधन दलहरूको प्राथमिकता बन्यो । अदालतले पुनरावलोकन अस्वीकार गरेपश्चात् संशोधनले गति लिएको हो । नेकपाको झण्डै दुई तिहाइको सरकार भएका बखत यो मामलामा काम गर्न यो पंक्तिकारलाई पनि जिम्मेवारी आइपर्‍यो ।

https://www.onlinekhabar.com/2024/10/1559973/how-was-the-trc-bill-possible?fbclid=IwY2xjawGPF31leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHcuxNxo08-ASogyBfICi3VfQ_qMpTpLOZkqqIrNEIsGUwt3BLBMVvY8pEw_aem_f33MZJb7FKdLONjodx-myA 

१२ बुँदे समझदारीको पृष्ठभूमि नबुझी टीआरसी बुझिन्न

संक्रमणकालीन न्याय अर्थात् टीआरसीको चर्चा–परिचर्चा यतिबेला फेरि चुलिएको छ । प्रधानमन्त्री केपी ओलीले संयुक्त राष्ट्रसंघको महासभामा टीआरसी बारे सम्बोधन गर्नुभयो । राष्ट्रसंघका महासचिव एन्टोनियो गुटेरेससँगको भेटमा हामी यसलाई इमानदारी साथ कार्यान्वयन गर्छौं भन्नुभयो । जब महासचिव गुटेरेस नेपाल भ्रमणमा आएका थिए, त्यतिबेला प्रतिपक्षमा रहेका उनै ओलीले टीआरसीमा प्रचण्ड इमानदार छैनन् भन्ने अभिव्यक्ति दिएका थिए । तर तिनै प्रचण्ड प्रतिपक्षमा रहेका बेला यो विधेयक पास हुन पुग्यो ।

सत्ता पक्षमा रहँदा टीआरसी विधेयकको कुरा गर्ने, विपक्षमा आएपछि यसलाई अड्काउने दोहोरो भूमिका खेल्ने प्रचलनको अन्त्य भयो । प्रमुख प्रतिपक्षी दलको नेताको हैसियतमा पनि प्रचण्डले उक्त विधेयक अड्काएनन् । सायद यसले केही अप्ठ्यारो पारेको र सोको स्पष्टीकरण दिन बाध्य भएका पनि हुन सक्छन् हाम्रा प्रधानमन्त्री ।

जे होस्, धेरैले अनुमान नगरेको माओवादी प्रतिपक्षमा र एमाले प्रधानमन्त्री भएका बखत टीआरसी विधेयक पारित भयो, त्यो पनि सर्वसम्मतिले ।https://www.onlinekhabar.com/2024/10/1548602/trc-cannot-be-understood-without-understanding-the-background-of-the-12-point-agreement 

Current Politics: A Marxist Analysis and Impact on Nepalese Maoist.

                                   

Current Politics: A Marxist Analysis and Impact on Nepalese Maoist

Khimlal Devkota

Central Committee member Nepal Communist Party (Maoist-Center)

 

A Marxist analysis of the current global political situation looks at global capitalist dynamics, emerging socialist ideologies, and the influence of class struggles, wealth distribution, and labor rights. For Nepal, specifically the Nepali Maoist parties, this analysis helps to examine how global shifts impact their ideological positions and domestic strategies. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

1. Global Capitalism and Rising Inequality

• Current Context: Global capitalism has intensified post-COVID, with income inequality widening as wealth concentrates in the hands of a small elite. Workers face stagnant wages, poor working conditions, and reduced job security, especially with the rise of gig economies and automation.
• Marxist Perspective: Marxists argue that capitalism’s structural flaws inherently generate crises and that current economic systems lead to exploitation and alienation. Due to the spread of neoliberal policies, the global South, which includes Nepal, faces increased dependency on developed nations.
• Impact on Nepali Maoists: Maoist parties in Nepal could leverage anti-capitalist rhetoric to address economic grievances, advocating for reforms targeting income inequality, worker protections, and social welfare, appealing to marginalized populations affected by economic instability.

2. US-China Rivalry and Geopolitical Shifts

• Current Context: The US and China are engaged in a global struggle for political and economic influence, especially over resources, trade routes, and technology. Both countries impact international relations, with developing nations often caught in between.
• Marxist Perspective: From a Marxist perspective, this rivalry represents competing forms of capitalism (state-led vs. liberal market economies) rather than a genuine ideological split. The clash leads to imperialistic pursuits that disrupt local economies in developing nations.
• Impact on Nepali Maoists: Nepali Maoist parties can position themselves by advocating for non-alignment, sovereignty, and independence from superpowers. They may also push against multinational interests in Nepal, calling for nationalism aligned with socialist values to resist external interference.

3. Environmental Crisis and Climate Justice

• Current Context: The ongoing climate crisis, driven by industrial capitalism, has led to increased climate-induced migration, natural disasters, and food security challenges. These effects are disproportionately felt in countries like Nepal.
• Marxist Perspective: Marxist analysis sees capitalism as incompatible with sustainable environmental practices. Exploitative resource extraction and profit-driven industries are unsustainable, worsening global inequity as the poor bear the brunt of environmental degradation.
• Impact on Nepali Maoists: Nepali Maoist parties could push for “eco-socialism,” incorporating environmental justice within their framework. Emphasizing sustainable development and advocating for green reforms, they could work to mobilize communities around these issues, highlighting the global capitalist contribution to environmental harm in Nepal.

4. Rise of Right-Wing Populism

• Current Context: Right-wing populism is gaining momentum globally, often framing socialism as a threat. Leaders in many countries use populist rhetoric to mobilize nationalist, anti-immigration, and conservative social agendas.
• Marxist Perspective: Marxists argue that right-wing populism arises as a reactionary response to the failings of neoliberal capitalism, directing popular anger at immigrants or minority groups rather than at systemic economic inequalities.
• Impact on Nepali Maoists: Nepali Maoists may face challenges from rising nationalism and anti-socialist sentiments. By positioning themselves as defenders of working-class interests and social justice, Maoist parties can counteract populist narratives, highlighting socio-economic reforms that resonate with local grievances rather than focusing solely on nationalism.

5. Worker Struggles and Labor Rights

• Current Context: Globally, workers are increasingly unionizing and advocating for rights in response to job precocity, low wages, and anti-union policies. In countries like Nepal, labor migration is high, and migrant workers face significant exploitation abroad.
• Marxist Perspective: Marxism emphasizes that labor rights are central to dismantling capitalist exploitation, with the working class positioned as the main force for revolutionary change.
• Impact on Nepali Maoists: Nepali Maoist parties could renew focus on labor rights domestically and for migrant workers abroad. Aligning with workers’ rights movements may bolster their support among lower-income populations, framing labor rights as a step towards broader societal equity.

6. Social Movements and Identity Politics

• Current Context: Global social movements related to race, gender, and other identities reshape political discourse. There is a growing push for equality and representation across social identities.
• Marxist Perspective: While traditional Marxism focuses on class as the central identity, contemporary Marxists recognize that identity-based struggles often intersect with class oppression and must be addressed within a socialist framework.
• Impact on Nepali Maoists: The Maoist parties, having roots in advocating for marginalized groups (e.g., ethnic minorities, Dalits), could strengthen their commitment to inclusive representation. Embracing intersectional approaches, they may expand their base by aligning identity politics with their broader anti-capitalist and anti-feudal stance.

7. Technology, Surveillance, and Control

• Current Context: Technology, especially artificial intelligence, has expanded state and corporate surveillance capabilities, with significant privacy and ethical concerns. Automation also poses a threat to traditional jobs.
• Marxist Perspective: Marxists critique technological advancements under capitalism, arguing that they concentrate power in corporate hands while stripping labor of value. Technology, unless socialized, exacerbates class divisions.
• Impact on Nepali Maoists: Nepali Maoists can critique technology’s role in labor displacement and surveillance, advocating for policies that democratize technology. They may call for state-led technological reforms that promote worker welfare and data sovereignty.

In Conclusion

Nepali Maoist parties are impacted by global capitalist dynamics, ideological battles, and social movements. To maintain relevance, they could emphasize policies targeting income inequality, environmental justice, labor rights, and social inclusion. By situating Nepal’s issues within a global Marxist framework, they can advocate for socialism that resonates locally, aligning with international leftist movements to address both global and Nepali-specific concerns.